Beer Judge Certification Program
  • News
  • FAQ
  • Store
  • Contact Us
BJCP print header
Beer Judge Certification Program
  • BJCP Style Guidelines
    • Style Guidelines Downloads
    • Introduction to the 2021 Guidelines
    • Introduction to Beer Styles
    • 2021 Beer Style Guidelines
      • 1. Standard American Beer
      • 2. International Lager
      • 3. Czech Lager
      • 4. Pale Malty European Lager
      • 5. Pale Bitter European Beer
      • 6. Amber Malty European Lager
      • 7. Amber Bitter European Beer
      • 8. Dark European Lager
      • 9. Strong European Beer
      • 10. German Wheat Beer
      • 11. British Bitter
      • 12. Pale Commonwealth Beer
      • 13. Brown British Beer
      • 14. Scottish Ale
      • 15. Irish Beer
      • 16. Dark British Beer
      • 17. Strong British Ale
      • 18. Pale American Ale
      • 19. Amber and Brown American Beer
      • 20. American Porter and Stout
      • 21. IPA
      • 22. Strong American Ale
      • 23. European Sour Ale
      • 24. Belgian Ale
      • 25. Strong Belgian Ale
      • 26. Monastic Ale
      • 27. Historical Beer
      • 28. American Wild Ale
      • 29. Fruit Beer
      • 30. Spiced Beer
      • 31. Alternative Fermentables Beer
      • 32. Smoked Beer
      • 33. Wood Beer
      • 34. Specialty Beer
    • Introduction to Mead Guidelines
    • 2015 Mead Style Guidelines
      • M1. Traditional Mead
      • M2. Fruit Mead
      • M3. Spiced Mead
      • M4. Specialty Mead
    • Introduction to Cider Guidelines
    • 2025 Cider Style Guidelines
      • C1. Traditional Cider
      • C2. Strong Cider
      • C3. Specialty Cider
      • C4. Perry
    • Style Guidelines Appendices and References
      • Appendix A: Alternate Categorizations
      • Appendix B: Local Styles
      • Provisional Styles
      • Style Entry Suggestions
      • Past Style Guidelines
      • Errata
      • Special Ingredients Descriptions
  • Exam & Certification
    • Exam Program Overview
      • BJCP Exam Structure
      • Exam Requirements
      • Information for Examinees
      • Online Exam
      • Exam Fees
      • Retired Exams
    • Exam Calendar
    • Beer Judge Program
      • Studying for the Beer Exam
      • BJCP Exam Program Description
      • Judge Procedures Manual
      • Online Beer Exam Study Guide
      • Beer Exam Study Guide
      • Sample Scoresheets
    • Mead Judge Program
      • Mead Judge Training & Study Program
      • Studying for the Mead Exam
      • Introduction to Mead Guidelines
      • Mead Guidelines
    • Cider Judge Program
      • Studying for the Cider Exam
      • Introduction to Cider Guidelines
      • Cider Guidelines
    • Exam Administration
      • Scheduling Procedures
      • Exam Administrator Guide
      • Approved Exam Proctor Lists
    • Exam Grading
      • Exam Scoring Guide
      • BJCP Scoresheet Guide
  • Competition Center
    • Competition Center
    • Competition Calendar
    • Competition Handbook
    • Rules & Regulations
    • Registration & Payment
    • Reporting
    • Supplies & Reference Materials
    • Software
  • Education & Training
    • Program Information
    • Point Award Outline
    • Judge Training and Study Programs
    • Education Resources
      • Library
      • Vocabulary
      • Beer Faults
      • Mead Faults
      • Cider Faults
      • Color Guide
    • Sensory Training
      • Malt Sensory Training
      • Sensory Kits
  • Member Services
    • General Information
    • Membership Guide
    • Judge Record Login
    • Address Change
    • BJCP Name Badges
    • BJCP Lapel Pins
    • Order Printed Style Guidelines
    • Newsletter Articles
    • Annual Reports
    • Merchandise
    • Election Information
      • Voting
  • International Resources
    • Translations
    • Countries
  • About
    • Introduction to the BJCP
    • Governance
      • BJCP Organization
      • Directorate Charters
      • Officers
      • Job Descriptions
      • Bylaws
      • BJCP Policies
      • Board Actions
      • Meeting Minutes
      • Articles of Incorporation
      • Tax Determination Letter
    • Reference
      • BJCP Regions
      • Exam Fees
      • Judge Ranks
      • Judge Status
      • Experience Point Award Schedule
      • Definitions
    • Statistics
      • Current Stats
      • Database Reports
      • Departed Judges
    • History
      • Origins
      • Independence
      • Past Board of Directors
      • Past Staff
  • Home
  • Newsletters
  • Exam Directorate Update
  • Exam Directorate Update

    March 25, 2020
    Sarah Bridegroom

     by Exam Director Sarah Bridegroom

     Overall exam activity in 2019 was lively: over 1200 exams were administered: 85% beer, 6 % written, 7% mead, 2% cider. Approximately 1000 people earned a passing certificate for the entrance exam: 9% for mead, 5 % for cider, and the remainder for beer.  Exam growth continues in several regions including Latin America, Europe and Asia.

    Notable events of 2019 include the beginning of the cider program, generating both new cider judges and qualified proctors. [hyperlink]  Also progressing last year were upgrades to grader forms and communication tools, and improved data collection for exam administration. 

    We welcomed both new graders and new language providers into the program throughout 2019. The grader group has worked collaboratively by providing insight into grading procedures, and helping new graders become proficient in exam evaluation.

    While exam data similar to that above are often of interest, there are other, lesser- known data and trends that affect the program.  That can include trends that generate concern or warrant extra attention. The Exam Directorate has identified salient examples below. These scenarios do not apply to all areas or all exams, but apply often enough to take notice and to identify as areas of needed improvement.

    Proctor Participation  

    Obtaining appropriate qualified proctors is part of the exam-planning process.  For exam administrators, this means identifying and obtaining commitments from qualified proctors before submitting an application for an exam.  For the qualified judges, it means making yourself available and accepting invitations to proctor. Qualified proctor participation is evaluated during application review.

    Exam Attendance 

    A notable number of exams this past year were not full. In some cases, attendance numbers fell below the minimum number of examinees. When applying to host an exam and throughout exam planning, please perform due diligence in not only evaluating demand but also successfully filling available seats. 

    Exam Administrator Performance

    It is crucial that exam administrators follow BJCP protocols. These protocols are designed to maintain the quality of the exams (qualified proctors, good beverage planning), efficient scheduling, grading and reporting (timely and complete submission of exam data, correct file formatting, obtaining required ED approvals) and fair access to potential examinees (non-exclusionary registration practices).  Also, as the program has expanded outside of the US, financial pressures are more pronounced. Follow BJCP guidelines with respect to spending, ED approvals, and requests for reimbursements. Failure to adhere to BJCP policy and procedure places a site’s future exams at risk. 

    Data Confidentiality

    Exam data is considered confidential data.  Any judge that acts on behalf of the BJCP is expected to treat it as such. Whether examinee, proctor, or grading data, the BJCP expects that data custodians are respectful of not only governing policies, but also your BJCP colleagues’ right to confidentiality and parity.

    Social Media

    Be mindful of not only others’ personal boundaries but also data confidentiality when creating or commenting on exam-related content on social media platforms. Items that jeopardize either a judge’s anonymity or data can have unintended, negative impact. 

    Throughout 2020, we’ll continue our focus on various policies and procedures that govern the program. Objectives for 2020 include:

    • Provide follow up information steps for exam administrators;
    • Work with the Board of Directors to improve protocols governing proctor-related reimbursements;
    • Evaluate growth strategies for the exam program;
    • Upgrade standardized forms and exam program documents; and
    • Support process automation goals.

    The Exam Directorate and exam participants appreciate the volunteer time and expertise that our judges lend in support and growth of the exam program. Thank you to all exam volunteers that participated last year and those that are continuing service in 2020.  Thank you as well to the members of the Exam Directorate. It takes a lot of time and accountability to make successful programs. Best wishes to all for a prosperous and productive year.  

    Judge Login

    BJCP Stats

    6,454
    Active BJCP Judges


    13,572
    Sanctioned Competitions


    2,329,786
    Beers Judged


    Data current as of May 11, 2025

    Competition Calendar

    May 17

    28th Annual BEER & Mead Brew Off

    Port Jefferson Station, NY


    May 17

    The DWW Homebrewers Beer Fest

    Norristown, PA


    May 17

    SMASH Homebrewing Competition 2025

    Split, , HR


    May 17

    2025 Brew Battle sponsored by Sam Adams

    San Antonio, TX


    May 17

    43nd Annual Oregon Homebrew Festival

    Corvallis, OR


    Find a competition near you >

    American Homebrewers Association Ad

    Beer Styles

    • Beer Style Guidelines
    • Guidelines FAQ
    • Order a Copy

    Exam

    • Exam Calendar
    • Study Resources
    • Online Exam

    Resources

    • Judge Record
    • Membership Guide
    • Contact Us

    Competition

    • Calendar
    • Rules & Regulations
    • Reference Materials

    © 1999-2025, Beer Judge Certification Program | Terms & Policies

    x
    Top